1 files changed, 93 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/board-private-mandriva-2012-archive/Re: [board-private] News from Mandriva - nicolas vigier <boklm@mars-attacks.org> - 2012-05-15 0041.eml b/board-private-mandriva-2012-archive/Re: [board-private] News from Mandriva - nicolas vigier <boklm@mars-attacks.org> - 2012-05-15 0041.eml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..aa76029
--- /dev/null
+++ b/board-private-mandriva-2012-archive/Re: [board-private] News from Mandriva - nicolas vigier <boklm@mars-attacks.org> - 2012-05-15 0041.eml
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+Delivered-To: ennael1@gmail.com
+Received: by 10.76.82.164 with SMTP id j4csp86039oay;
+        Mon, 14 May 2012 15:41:11 -0700 (PDT)
+Received: by 10.180.79.72 with SMTP id h8mr24318851wix.1.1337035271405;
+        Mon, 14 May 2012 15:41:11 -0700 (PDT)
+Return-Path: <board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org>
+Received: from alamut.mageia.org (alamut.mageia.org. [212.85.158.146])
+        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n59si20628523wel.141.2012.05.14.15.41.10;
+        Mon, 14 May 2012 15:41:11 -0700 (PDT)
+Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org designates 212.85.158.146 as permitted sender) client-ip=212.85.158.146;
+Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org designates 212.85.158.146 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org
+Received: by alamut.mageia.org (Postfix, from userid 486)
+	id B02EB44643; Tue, 15 May 2012 00:41:10 +0200 (CEST)
+Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
+	by alamut.mageia.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5417544643
+	for <board-private@ml.mageia.org>; Tue, 15 May 2012 00:41:09 +0200 (CEST)
+X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mageia.org
+Received: from alamut.mageia.org ([127.0.0.1])
+	by localhost (alamut.mageia.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025)
+	with ESMTP id JEa8QFY9qRnj for <board-private@ml.mageia.org>;
+	Tue, 15 May 2012 00:41:08 +0200 (CEST)
+Received: from mx1.mars-attacks.org (invaders.mars-attacks.org [88.191.83.84])
+	by alamut.mageia.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E875445E5
+	for <board-private@ml.mageia.org>; Tue, 15 May 2012 00:41:08 +0200 (CEST)
+Received: by mx1.mars-attacks.org (Postfix, from userid 500)
+	id 81586280874E; Tue, 15 May 2012 00:41:06 +0200 (CEST)
+Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 00:41:06 +0200
+From: nicolas vigier <boklm@mars-attacks.org>
+To: board-private@ml.mageia.org
+Message-ID: <20120514224106.GF21938@mars-attacks.org>
+References: <4FB16CC3.7020309@gmail.com> <4FB16DF6.2050001@googlemail.com> <4FB16E9C.7020903@gmail.com> <4FB17214.7010501@googlemail.com> <20120514212033.GE21938@mars-attacks.org> <CANa9xwtrcKYD5NUK=pH3xZUMOK3xPSWYKRhmM2TTpQGNidYKDw@mail.gmail.com>
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
+Content-Disposition: inline
+In-Reply-To: <CANa9xwtrcKYD5NUK=pH3xZUMOK3xPSWYKRhmM2TTpQGNidYKDw@mail.gmail.com>
+User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
+Subject: Re: [board-private] News from Mandriva
+X-Loop: board-private@ml.mageia.org
+X-Sequence: 35
+Errors-to: board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org
+Precedence: list
+Precedence: bulk
+Sender: board-private-request@ml.mageia.org
+X-no-archive: yes
+List-Id: <board-private.ml.mageia.org>
+List-Help: <mailto:sympa@ml.mageia.org?subject=help>
+List-Subscribe: <mailto:sympa@ml.mageia.org?subject=subscribe%20board-private>
+List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sympa@ml.mageia.org?subject=unsubscribe%20board-private>
+List-Post: <mailto:board-private@ml.mageia.org>
+List-Owner: <mailto:board-private-request@ml.mageia.org>
+List-Archive: <https://ml.mageia.org/l/arc/board-private>
+
+On Mon, 14 May 2012, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
+
+> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:20 PM, nicolas vigier <boklm@mars-attacks.org> wrote:
+> > Yes I think it should be clear that Mageia doesn't do anything special
+> > for Mandriva, which is treated like any other contributor, and is
+> > independant. Maybe we can prepare a blog post to publish after the
+> > announce from Mandriva to remind this and avoid possible misunderstandings ?
+> 
+> Yes, however I think we should not insist on the possible
+> misunderstandings in our communication/discussion, but focus on the
+> good parts, questions will come afterwise (and that's good too):
+> 
+>  - it's great, for everyone, because Mageia is a strong platform;
+> Mandriva will benefit from it for their server product; and Mageia
+> will benefit from it from possible Mandriva contributions;
+>  - it shows that Mageia has reached quite a milestone;
+>  - it's not revolutionary (Mageia is expected to be used for
+> derivative projects), but it's cool to see Mandriva acknowledge what
+> we did, in some way;
+>  - of course, this does not impact how the project is governed,
+> because it's unrelated.
+> 
+> If we keep on insisting at first on the potential misunderstandings,
+> people will focus on that. And the core news is not about potential
+> mishaps, but about a company that is using technology from a open
+> source project for their own products.
+> 
+> Of course, if people raise questions, and only then, it will be a good
+> time to reassure everyone. It's better to do it in this order, because
+> it will let us know what are exactly the concerns of people out there,
+> instead of guessing about these.
+
+I think we should not wait for people to raise questions about this, or
+it will be too late. When the announce of Mageia was done, I have seen
+a lot of people comparing Mandriva/Mageia with RedHat/Fedora, although
+the announcement was quite clear that it is not the same.
+
+If we don't explain this clearly and don't insist on it, a lot of people
+will immediately think it is the same as RedHat/Fedora, or that Mandriva
+and Mageia will merge.
+